The Only 4 things that actually sell (pick one)
Description
*Get our CEO lessons in one guide:* https://clickhubspot.com/mfc2 Episode 848: Sam Parr ( https://x.com/theSamParr ) and Shaan Puri ( https://x.com/ShaanVP ) talk about the 7 rules of sales, Bernard Arnault’s revenge letter, plus the economics of Magic: The Gathering. — Show Notes: (0:00) highest value comment from HackerNews (2:50) always bring 2 diet cokes to a negotiation (7:36) Saving lives as a service (17:24) Bernard Arnaults revenge letter (25:29) The business of Magic: The Gathering (41:58) Bryan Johnson, The Dana White of Longevity Links: • Hacker News comment - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23285438 — Check Out Sam's Stuff: • Hampton (joinhampton.com): My community for founders. Average member does $25m/year. Many of the guests are members. Get after it...apply: http://joinhampton.com/mfm — Check Out Shaan's Stuff: • Shaan's weekly email - https://www.shaanpuri.com • Visit https://www.somewhere.com/mfm to hire worldwide talent like Shaan and get $500 off for being an MFM listener. Hire developers, assistants, marketing pros, sales teams and more for 80% less than US equivalents. • Mercury - Shaan uses Mercury across all of his companies. you can too: http://mercury.com/ Mercury is a fintech company, not an FDIC-insured bank. Banking services provided by Choice Financial Group, Column, N.A., Members FDIC • I run all my newsletters on Beehiiv and you should too + we're giving away $10k to our favorite newsletter, check it out: beehiiv.com/mfm-challenge My First Million is a HubSpot Original Podcast // Brought to you by HubSpot Media // Production by Arie Desormeaux // Editing by Ezra Bakker Trupiano /
Summary
Generated by gpt-5.6-terraAt-a-Glance
- Verdict: Skim
- Core thesis: The episode argues that durable selling and category-building come from solving urgent human problems, creating genuine reciprocity and likability, and applying unusually persistent founder-led craft to a compelling product or mission.
- Why it matters: It offers several reusable operating patterns for GTM and brand building: frame value in fundamental buyer outcomes, earn distribution through trusted community nodes, turn criticism into credibility-building communication, and recognize when a category needs an exceptional founder-operator rather than merely market momentum.
- Best use: Use it as a source of sales, launch, PR, and founder-market-fit heuristics; skim the Magic: The Gathering and Bernard Arnault segments for the most concrete business lessons.
Executive Summary
The conversation opens with a compact sales philosophy sourced from a Hacker News comment: sales is people and problem-solving, and buyers ultimately pay for time, money, sex, or approval/peace of mind. The practical refinement is to sell “aspirin,” meaning a pressing painkiller, rather than “vitamins,” whose optional benefits create less predictable demand. The hosts pair this with Cialdini’s reciprocity principle: consistently deliver useful, authentic value without an immediate ask, because relationships and goodwill become a long-run distribution channel.
The episode then illustrates how goodwill can be mishandled: a small favor only works when it is natural and welcomed, not performed as a visible persuasion tactic. It shifts to United Hatzalah, an Israeli volunteer emergency-response nonprofit, as an example of a mission that recruits participation by giving people a concrete, meaningful role. Its distributed volunteer model aims to bridge the gap before ambulances arrive, using proximity, coordination technology, training, and accumulated operational data.
The strongest business case study is Magic: The Gathering. The hosts describe it as an enduring collectible-game flywheel rather than a one-off board game: players own evolving card collections, spend over time, gain status and utility from rare cards, trade them, and participate in a community. The founder’s edge was prolonged game-design obsession, rigorous playtesting, targeted adoption through influential hobby-community participants, and early scarcity that accelerated demand. The hosts frame the result as a roughly $2 billion annual-revenue franchise for Hasbro that has compounded at about 17% annually for 17 years.
A separate PR lesson comes from Bernard Arnault’s reported public response to a critical investigation into his family and LVMH. Rather than deny, attack, or play victim, he used humor, acknowledged flattering elements of the critique, and embedded concrete counter-facts about LVMH’s global scale, jobs, taxes, and philanthropy. The hosts argue that audiences often retain a leader’s tone, confidence, and likability longer than detailed claims. They extend this to founder-led category creation: markets such as UFC, longevity, and potentially esports may require a rare, unusually committed public operator to force a category into existence.
Key Takeaways
- Claim: Position products against one of four fundamental purchase motives—time, money, sex, or approval/peace of mind—and prioritize urgent painkillers over optional improvement. | Evidence: The Hacker News sales leader’s framework says people buy only those four outcomes and “buy aspirin always” while buying vitamins only unpredictably. | Implication: For GTM messaging, translate feature claims into a concrete buyer outcome and test whether the offer addresses an immediate, expensive, risky, or emotionally salient problem rather than a vague future benefit. | Caveat: This is a deliberately compressed persuasion framework, not a complete account of institutional, technical, regulatory, or multi-stakeholder buying decisions.
- Claim: Relationship-based selling works when usefulness is consistent and authentic, not when a favor is transparently deployed as a manipulation tactic. | Evidence: The hosts cite Cialdini’s reciprocity principle and a motorcycle negotiation where a $1,800 asking price reportedly fell to $1,400 after the buyer casually brought the seller a Coke; the attempted replay in a school-principal meeting failed when the Diet Coke offer was rejected and the program was shut down. | Implication: Build a repeatable relationship practice around unsolicited, relevant help—introductions, useful research, ideas, or thoughtful outreach—while avoiding transactional “gift before ask” theater. | Caveat: A small gift does not create an obligation if it is unwanted, forced, or mismatched to the setting; it can instead signal manipulation.
- Claim: Distributed, proximity-based volunteer networks can create outsized social value when the mission is simple, training is bounded, and dispatch is operationally sophisticated. | Evidence: United Hatzalah reportedly grew from a small trained volunteer group to roughly 18,000 volunteers in Israel, handles about 2,000 calls daily (one every 45 seconds), targets 90-second response times, and uses historical data such as higher morning heart-attack incidence to prepare coverage. | Implication: For community or marketplace systems, a compelling mission can be a supply-acquisition engine when participants receive identity, purpose, and a clearly defined way to contribute—not merely financial incentives. | Caveat: The speakers note that a U.S. launch attempt around 2019–2020 was a false start; transferability depends on local regulation, coordination infrastructure, funding, and volunteer participation.
- Claim: In a reputational attack, humor plus specific factual reframing can be more effective than defensiveness because it improves perceived confidence and likability. | Evidence: The hosts describe Bernard Arnault’s “Merci” response to Le Monde’s six-part investigation: he jokes about being France’s “last royal family,” concedes that he speaks with political leaders, then cites LVMH’s 75% revenue outside Europe, 220,000 employees, 40,000 France-based employees, a reported €200 million Notre Dame contribution, and €50 million for mathematics research. | Implication: Prepare CEO communications that acknowledge the frame without accepting hostile premises, use a memorable human voice, and introduce independently defensible facts that neutral observers can retain. | Caveat: This posture is viable only when the underlying allegations can withstand scrutiny and the speaker has credible facts to add; humor cannot substitute for accountability in a substantive crisis.
- Claim: Magic: The Gathering’s durability came from changing the product from a fixed game into an evolving personal collection with recurring spending, status, tradeability, and community participation. | Evidence: The hosts contrast fixed-box games such as chess, checkers, and Monopoly with Magic’s player-owned decks, inspired by founder Richard Garfield’s childhood experience trading marbles. They say the average player spends about $100 annually for eight or nine years, while rare cards can sell for hundreds of thousands of dollars. | Implication: When designing recurring-revenue products, seek legitimate reasons for customers to develop an evolving asset, identity, or capability over time—not just repeated billing for the same static value. | Caveat: Collectible economics can be strengthened by scarcity and secondary-market enthusiasm, but they also risk over-reliance on collectors, perceived pay-to-win dynamics, and speculative behavior.
- Claim: Strong early adoption often comes from obsessive product testing and concentrated influence, not broad launch marketing. | Evidence: Garfield reportedly tested Magic with both card-game players and statistically oriented Strat-O-Matic baseball players to find design failures, then drove convention-to-convention to win over shop owners, magazine writers, and respected players. The hosts say Magic sold hundreds of thousands of cards in its first four days and roughly 10 million in its first year after launching in 1993. | Implication: Before scaling distribution, identify the small set of expert users, operators, and community gatekeepers whose adoption validates the product and enables credible peer-to-peer explanation. | Caveat: The exact sales figures and historical details are relayed conversationally rather than sourced in the transcript.
- Claim: Some category-defining businesses require a singular founder with an unusually rare combination of resources, obsession, public presence, and willingness to endure rejection. | Evidence: The hosts use Richard Garfield, Dana White and the Fertittas with UFC, Airbnb’s repeated near-death experiences, and Brian Johnson’s longevity project as examples. They argue that Johnson combines personal capital, extreme self-experimentation, scientific interest, business skill, and social-media instincts in a way that made him a category catalyst. | Implication: In evaluating emerging categories or investments, assess whether there is a credible category-builder with the stamina and unusual skill stack to make the market legible and culturally salient—not just an attractive trend line. | Caveat: This narrative can over-credit individual founders and understate timing, teams, luck, capital markets, and broader cultural conditions.
Detailed Brief
Magic: The Gathering as a franchise and acquisition strategy
- Claims: The hosts characterize Magic as Hasbro’s cash cow, saying roughly one in three company revenue dollars is driven by Magic.; They argue that early product scarcity was not merely a supply failure: empty shelves prompted store owners to investigate the product and amplified a passionate collector economy.; They describe the purchase of Dungeons & Dragons as a strategic diversification move before a sale or IPO process, making the company less dependent on one intellectual-property franchise.
- Evidence: The speakers say Magic is on pace for about $2 billion in annual revenue, following roughly $1.7 billion the prior year, and that it had its best quarter yet.; They report that Wizards of the Coast acquired the debt-burdened Dungeons & Dragons business for an estimated $30–40 million, then later sold to Hasbro for a reported $300 million-plus with an earnout approaching $500 million.; The contrast offered is a one-time $20 board game versus a multi-year player lifetime value in the thousands through incremental collecting and play.
- Caveats: The revenue, acquisition-price, sale-price, and growth assertions are presented as conversational estimates and should be verified before using them in investment or strategy work.; Scarcity can build cultural value in collectible products, but deliberate scarcity can also alienate core users if access becomes too constrained.
- Implications: A portfolio acquisition can increase strategic optionality and exit defensibility when it reduces single-product concentration while sharing distribution, audience, or brand adjacency.; The most defensible recurring models often layer functional participation with identity, ownership, liquidity, and social recognition.
Attention, charisma, and public category leadership
- Claims: The hosts contend that people often forget the content of a public exchange but retain an impression of the speaker’s confidence and likability.; They cite political communication as an example: a public figure can gain broad appeal even among people who reject the underlying policies if the delivery is memorable, concrete, and human.; They view Brian Johnson less as proof of any specific longevity intervention than as a public operator who made longevity culturally visible.
- Evidence: The hosts reference Bernard Arnault’s use of joking language and a compliment to Le Monde’s crossword as a way to turn an adversarial response into an engaging public artifact.; They mention Zohran Mamdani’s social content and public appearances as examples of charisma and communication mechanics, while explicitly saying they disagree with many of his policies.; Brian Johnson is described as having sold Braintree/Venmo for roughly $700 million and redirecting his ambition toward historical impact rather than further wealth accumulation.
- Caveats: Likability can raise attention and trust, but it is not evidence that the person’s business claims, political proposals, or health practices are correct.; The transcript does not substantiate medical claims associated with longevity experimentation.
- Implications: For founder brands, an authentic, high-agency public persona can be a strategic distribution asset when it clarifies a category and attracts observers who would not engage with technical messaging.; Separate the evaluation of a spokesperson’s communication effectiveness from the factual validation of their substantive claims.
Notable Concepts & Terms
- Four things people buy: The episode’s sales shorthand: time, money, sex, and approval or peace of mind are presented as the underlying outcomes to which offers should be mapped.
- Aspirin vs. vitamins: A prioritization test for demand: acute, painful problems generate more reliable purchasing behavior than optional self-improvement.
- Rule of reciprocity: Cialdini principle that receiving a favor creates a tendency to return one, used here as a relationship-building mechanism rather than a closing tactic.
- Good Samaritan Laws: Legal protections, as described by the speakers, for people who give good-faith emergency assistance; central to why United Hatzalah remains a volunteer nonprofit.
- Collectible game flywheel: A product structure in which users continuously acquire, improve, trade, and display personally owned components, generating recurring revenue and community engagement.
- Influence the influencers: Magic’s reported launch tactic of winning shop owners, media writers, expert players, and other trusted community nodes before seeking broad adoption.
- Singular founder-market fit: The idea that certain businesses or categories require a particular individual’s idiosyncratic history, commitment, skills, and force of will to exist at all.
- Category catalyst: A public operator who makes an emerging area culturally salient and understandable, even if that person does not own the eventual dominant company.
Operator Notes / Why Ken Should Care
- Audit current GTM pages, outbound scripts, and demos: require each to name the specific time, money, risk/peace-of-mind, status/approval, or other core outcome being purchased; flag language that only describes features.
- Create a relationship-value operating cadence for priority customers, partners, and ecosystem operators: relevant introductions, concise research, implementation ideas, or problem-solving assets with no immediate commercial ask.
- For any community-dependent launch, map the true trust nodes—operators, expert practitioners, community owners, and credible educators—and design a high-touch pilot that makes them successful before buying broad reach.
- Add a crisis-communications decision rule: before issuing a defensive response, determine whether a humorous, fact-rich reframing can credibly shift the story; maintain substantiation for every factual counterclaim.
- Evaluate new recurring-product opportunities for an ownership loop: what accumulates for the user over time, how it becomes more useful or meaningful, and whether any secondary-market or status mechanism creates unhealthy incentive risk.
- When assessing an emerging sector, explicitly score the category-builder: founder stamina, unusual skill stack, capital access, public communication ability, and willingness to operate through prolonged resistance.
Source/Metadata
- Title: The Only 4 things that actually sell (pick one)
- Transcript words: 11171
- Duration seconds: 2909
- Timestamp note: No timestamps or chapters were present in the supplied transcript.
Transcript
Can I show you the highest-value comment on Hacker News that I've ever seen? Yeah, that has a lot of weight. This is from years and years ago, but it's this comment about sales because Hacker News is full of engineers, and they're like, "Hey, I suck at sales. Anybody can help me get better at this?" And this guy wrote seven points, and I just nodded my head so vigorously that my C4, C5 is a little sore. So let me just give you this here. He said, the guy goes, "Yeah, there's tons of resources to help you with sales, but I'll start with, I'll try to offer some simple tips." Number one, sales is a lot like golf. You can make it so complicated that it's almost impossible, or you can simply walk up and hit the ball. I've been leading sales orgs for about 20 years. My advice is to walk up and hit the ball. Number two, sales is about people, and it's about problem solving. It's not about tech or solutions or chemicals or lines of code or artichokes. It's about people. It's about solving problems. Number three, people buy four things, and four things only, ever. Those four things are time, money, sex, and approval or peace of mind. If you try to sell anything other than those four things, you will fail. Number four, people buy aspirin always. They'll buy vitamins sometimes, but it will be unpredictable. Sell aspirin. Number five, I say in every talk that I give that, all things being equal, people will buy from their friends. So make everything else equal, and then go make a lot of friends. Number six, being valuable and useful is all you'll ever need to sell things. Help people out. Send them interesting posts. Write birthday cards. Record videos. Share your ideas of how they could grow their business. Introduce them to people who would benefit from knowing each other and get out of the way. Expect nothing in return. Do this consistently and authentically, and people will find ways to give you money. I promise. Number seven, no one cares about your quota, your payroll, your OPEX, your burn rate. No one. They care about the problems you're solving for them. There are more than $100 trillion in the economy just waiting for you to breathe it in. Good luck. Who is this god of Hacker News? Are you reading any books? I am reading Influence again by Robert Cialdini. Why are you rereading Robert Cialdini's Influence? Because, as the great Buddhist proverb says, no man steps in the same river twice, for he is not the same man and the river is not the same river. Oh my god. How long have you waited to use that one? You start reading books, what can you do? You just start turning into a quote machine. No, but really, I think reading the best books again at different times in your life, it's a totally different book. You think you've read it. And what I found is you remember shockingly little of books. And so going back and reading great books is the gift that keeps giving, in that sense. So that's what I'm doing. Did you ever read the blog post that I wrote about Influence, his book? No. In 2014, I had just read his book, and I wanted to implement what he talked about. And he has this rule called the rule of reciprocity, which just says, let's say that neighbor one goes to neighbor two. Let's say I go to Sean and I say, "Hey, can I borrow a cup of sugar?" And you say, "Yeah, I got you." The next day, if you come to me and say, "Hey, can I borrow your car for the day?" even though those two asks aren't even remotely equal, I, because of the rule of reciprocity, am very likely to lend you my car. Because the rule of reciprocity states that if you do something nice for someone, they have a high chance of doing something nice in exchange for you, even if they aren't equal. And that's how society is built, one could say, based off the rule of reciprocity. So when I was a kid, I was 24 years old. There was a motorcycle for sale, I think for $1,800. And I went to buy it, and I took photos and documented all of this as I went. And I was like, "Hey, you have the motorcycle for $1,800. Let me see it. Let me check it out. Awesome. Oh, by the way, I'm really sorry I'm late. I wanted to stop and get a Coke because it was hot outside. I got one for you if you want one. Do you want one?" And he goes, "Yeah, sure. Thanks." And then I started talking to him, and I'm like, "Look, I love this motorcycle, but I'm a young guy. I don't have a lot of money. I know you're asking for 18. Could you do 14?" And he goes, "You brought me the Coke. You seem like a nice kid. Yeah, I guess I can do that." And so there's a blog post where I took photos of myself. When he was turned around, signing the paperwork, I took the photo. But anyway, the rule of reciprocity is pretty amazing. So let me tell you a funny follow-up story to that. I remember you telling the story about the Diet Coke and the negotiation and how you always bring two Diet Cokes to a negotiation, correct? You've told me this before, 10 years ago, right? Yeah, I try to bring a gift. Yeah, I try to bring something. Well, I took it as Diet Coke. So here's what happened. Recently, I was coaching this high school basketball team, as you know. And anytime I'm doing a project, I want to try to make it as interesting, as cool as possible. And what I do sometimes is I do things that are maybe not the default way of doing things. So I was trying to create content for the team so that the team would have really cool media going with it. And so the principal and the AD did not like it. Are you talking about the post that you made about your being a coach? Oh, being a coach, yeah. And how we were going to try to take this underdog team and try to get them to be state champions. And that was good. We were going to record the vlog along the way. So, post the vlog. It gets 20,000 views in the first 24 hours. But one of those views was the principal or the AD. They call me. They're like, "Hey, you need to take this down." So we said, "Okay, we'll take it down." And he says, "I want to meet with you. Be in my office Monday." Dude, you're getting called to the principal's office. I got called into the principal's office. And so here I am. I thought I was past this. I'm now in my late 30s, and I'm nervous. I'm going to the principal's office. And I bring, so we're recording a vlog of this thing, and I'm telling the vlog, I said, "My friend Sam taught me this trick, this little law of reciprocity. Let me put you guys on some game. People have this really high likelihood to return the favor if you do a small favor for them." And I said, "Watch. I'm going to be late to this meeting, but I'm going to stop and get this Diet Coke because this is the most important part of the meeting." And I'm like, "Follow me." A vlog camera follows me, and we get two Diet Cokes, and we go. And I'm so ready for this. And I get to the meeting, and we sit down, and I'm like, I don't fully remember the line that you said about how to do it. I think there's actually a really specific way in the book that Rampageo Dini describes it, which is, two people are doing a psych study. The guy walks out, and he comes back, and he says, "Hey, I asked the guy if I could have a Coke. He said yeah, so I brought you one too." So it just sounds very thoughtful in passing. And you said a very similar thing. And so I walk in, and I just go, he's like, "Hey, guys." And I go, "You want a Diet Coke?" And then he's like, and he just goes, "No, thanks." And now I have two Diet Cokes. I go, "I have two." I go, "I have two." And he goes, "I'm all set." And then I, and the vlog camera's on me, and it's the office. I look at the camera, and it's like, this is not going as planned. I'm Michael Scotting this. And then I open up the Diet Coke. It almost explodes because I've been nervous the whole time. Luckily, it doesn't totally foam over. He said, yeah, so I brought you one too. So it just sounds very thoughtful in passing. And you said a very similar thing. And so I walk in. And I just go. He's like, hey, guys. And I go, you want a Diet Coke? And then he's like. And he just goes, no thanks. And now I have two Diet Cokes. I go, I have two. I go, I have two. And he goes, I'm all set. And then I. And the vlog camera's on me. And it's the office. I look at the camera and it's like, this is not going as planned. I'm Michael Scotting this. And then I open up the Diet Coke. It almost explodes because I've been nervous the whole time. Luckily, it doesn't totally foam over. And I proceed to drink two Diet Cokes while this guy absolutely shuts down my program. And so that's the law of reciprocity gone wrong. That is so funny. That is so funny. That is so good. All right. I have a story for you. Hey, everyone. Really quick. If you're enjoying this episode on CEO stuff, delegating, having hard conversations with your team, hiring, then I've got something for you. So the team at HubSpot actually went and put together a bunch of best practices that Sean and I use in our own companies. And they put it together in something that's really easy to read and understand. And so if you want to save yourself 10 years of headache and heartache, then you should check it out. I wish we had this a long time ago. It would help me a lot, but there should be a QR code on your screen that you can scan or a link in the description. So check it out. It's totally free and totally awesome. So I told you the other day how, for the first time ever, I went out to dinner with someone, and I'm such a homebody. Well, my friend. What are you talking about? I visited you in New York. You literally walk around New York with a briefcase and business cards and Altoids in your pocket trying to meet people riding the subway. You're out. Don't try to take my shtick. I'm the homebody. You're the guy who's out there. But go ahead. I just carry the briefcase. My wife's like, why do you have this? I'm like, to do business. Yeah. Sam cosplays a businessman in New York City. I'm doing business, Sarah. I need the case. It's got the crayons and the snacks. Get off my back. Yeah. When you said attache, I was like, okay, that's enough. So I've been hanging out with this guy named Mark. Have you heard of GLG? Yeah. The expert network. So, you want to find out whether NVIDIA chips are going to go up or down. Maybe you would call someone, one of the buyers, who's an expert buyer who'd give you insights about the industry. Huge business. Yeah. And I've become good buddies with him. I've hung out with him a bunch because he lives in my neighborhood. And GLG, like you just explained, is a huge business. They filed to go public at one point, and so some of their numbers were public. It does something like over $100 million a year in profit and cash flow. Very amazing company. And we were just hanging out. He owns another business in the community space now that he loves. And he sits down and he starts telling me, I'm like, what are your hobbies? What else are you into? And he told me this crazy story. So I want you to Google something. Google, it's called United Hatzala. Okay. I found it. Okay. Equipment aid looks like a charity of some kind. Volunteer medical emergency services. Exactly. So listen to this story. So Mark started GLG when he was only 23, 24, a pretty young guy. Yeah. When he's something like 27, 28, he meets this guy named Ellie. Ellie was either an ambulance driver or was at the scene where this happened. But basically a kid was choking on his food, and they called an ambulance. The ambulance didn't make it there in time, and the kid died. And it really sat with him. He was really bothered by that because they come to find out that there actually was a doctor next door or down the block or something like that within a pretty close vicinity. And he's like, it really stinks that this ambulance took 15 or however many minutes to get here when there was a guy right here that could have cured this kid and he didn't have to die. And so Ellie ends up starting this very small thing with only six or 12 people where they basically self-organize, and they train themselves on how to do very simple things like CPR, the Heimlich Maneuver. And they train themselves on that. And then eventually they went to where they could even do an emergency baby delivery. And he started a nonprofit where he would actually give out these 40-pound backpacks that had a small amount of oxygen, a baby kit system, or a baby delivery kit so you can deliver a baby in case of an emergency, these really essential supplies. And he starts telling Mark about how he's got the thing going. And Mark's like, that's awesome. This thing could be it. This could be a really big thing. And Mark gives them $18,000 because Mark was just getting successful. But he's like, I have 18 grand I can give you, but I can be your co-founder and I can help commercialize this thing and make this a huge thing. And so it's been around for the last 18 years. And at this point, they have 18,000 volunteers in Israel. It's only in Israel. They answer something like 2,000 calls a day. And the mission statement is very simple. They say that on average it takes something like 12 or 10 minutes for an ambulance to arrive to you. Our goal is to get there in 90 seconds anywhere in Israel. And right now, I think they do it in two minutes. And Mark was telling me, he's like, basically right now, him and I went out to eat. He was like, if you were a member, you would carry your bag with you at all times. And if somebody 10 floors down got sick or something happened where they had to call an ambulance, you would be alerted because you are nearby. And you could run down and give them some type of aid until the ambulance got to them. And they could actually do the real stuff. But at least you could be a life-saving thing. And because of this, this company, it's a nonprofit, they have saved potentially millions of people because they've done this in the last 18 years. And what's interesting is they started this before iPhones, before GPS. And when they started it, they actually just gave out these walkie-talkies, these radios. And now it's gotten quite sophisticated. So the entire foundation runs off donations. And they are spending many tens of millions of dollars a year. And what they have noticed is, for example, through 18 years of data, they know that heart attacks are more likely to happen in the morning. Which means people are probably in their home versus the office. And so they know that they need to recruit volunteers who are on call and ready. And they're prepared for a potential heart attack within these areas. And they actually did a YouTube video on it. They have this entire AI setup where they know when to predict that something bad potentially might happen and to have their 8,000-person volunteer force ready. And there's a few interesting things here about this. One, there's this thing called Good Samaritan Laws. We have it in America. They have it in Israel. Which basically just says, when you're on an airplane and the captain goes, is there a doctor on board? Can someone help me? As long as that doctor acts in good faith, they can't be sued by the person. It's called the Good Samaritan Law. But if you are on there for pay, meaning if you're a professional, like I'm paying you money, there's an exchange of goods for you to do a service, you could potentially be sued. So Mark was like, this thing, it needs to strictly be a nonprofit. He said the second thing. He was like, in Israel, what's cool about this? He's like, we have super Orthodox Jews who are doing it. We have non-secular Jews who are doing it. We have Arabs, we have Muslims, we have Christians. He was like, I've noticed that what has brought us together is not just us sitting around talking, but I can get all groups of people to come and work together on something and get their hands dirty. And it really brought us all together. As long as that doctor acts in good faith, they can't be sued by the person. It's called the Good Samaritan Law. But if you are on there for pay, meaning if you're a professional, I'm paying you money, there's an exchange of goods for you to do a service, you could potentially be sued. So Mark was like, this thing needs to strictly be a nonprofit. He said the second thing, he was like, in Israel, what's cool about this? He's like, we have super Orthodox Jews who are doing it. We have non-secular Jews who are doing it. We have Arabs, we have Muslims, we have Christians. He was like, I've noticed that what has brought us together is not just us sitting around talking, but I can get all groups of people to come and work together on something and get their hands dirty. And it really brought us all together. And he was explaining this in a very altruistic way. And I totally got bought into it. And I was like, why aren't you in America? He's like, well, we actually did try to, but we started in 2019 or 2020, right before COVID. And it was a false start. So we just haven't made it here. But he's like, this 100% could work in virtually every city in America. And he was like, it could even work in rural areas. He's like, in rural areas, they have volunteer firefighters. But it was really fascinating to hear all about this stuff. Because I think that we talk about money and for-profit stuff. But if you are a social entrepreneur or something like that, this is a really interesting opportunity. And hearing him describe this, it was amazing. Dude, so cool. I was reading the stats about it just now. It says they basically handle one call every 45 seconds. Crazy, right? The scale of that's crazy. There's only 8,000 volunteers or 9,000 volunteers. So that's a lot of coverage. 2,000 calls a day and you only have 9,000 volunteers. Everybody's busy. This is not a once-in-a-blue-moon thing. This is wild. The average response time is three minutes. The goal is 90 seconds. That's nationwide and 24/7 coverage, which is pretty incredible. It kind of makes sense in a way, right? Because what are you? You asked him, what are your hobbies? And he told you this story, which is hilarious. Because you're probably like, he's like, what about you? You're like, skateboarding. But for people, to be able to be like, yeah, I saved a life today. Or this year. It gives you purpose, right? Yeah. Where else can you get that? That would be actually really meaningful for people if they felt like they could join something where they could actually do that. Well, think of the people who have kind of crappy jobs that they're not particularly motivated by. This is something where you're like, yeah, I can do that non-motivating thing. That pays the bills. I'm so thankful I have this. Yeah. Yeah. I have this thing that I am needed. And I actually have literally a life-changing impact on people. Yeah. Yeah. That's crazy. I thought you were going to say in the US, they just pivoted to DoorDash. It became DoorDash. Well. This is the founding story of food delivery. That is kind of interesting. But I thought this was awesome. And I was pretty inspired. Hearing, I think he said, he goes, we have 8,000 people who are part of the network. And he's like, we're growing. He's like, we're going to keep on growing. And he's like, one doctor who is probably doing okay, but he's not wealthy, gave us $4,000. And he's like, I got this line where I tell them this because I believe it to be true. He was like, you giving us $4,000 is the best donation we've ever received. Like, the fact that you are willing to do this, it is so important to us. And that's how they've grown to be able to spend tens of millions of dollars a year. Very cool. Very cool. Let's see. You want a lightweight? You want something quick and fun? You want something a little more cool and deep? Did you see this amazing? It's a master class of PR by Bernard Arnault. I didn't read it. What happened? It happened this morning, right? Oh, you got to see this. Okay. I don't normally pay too much attention to this stuff, but check this out. So, I saw this from Lulu. I don't know how you say her last name. Misservi. She's like the kind of Go Direct founder. She was doing PR at Anduril, and now she has her own fund and whatnot. Is she the one who has the handle where it's like, here's how you should and should not address PR issues? Yeah, yeah. She's just constantly giving founders advice. And her philosophy is Go Direct philosophy. So, anyways, check this out. So, this backstory is that Bernard Arnault, who you know probably better than I do, he's the titan behind the luxury conglomerate LVMH. And every once in a while, he's the richest man in the world. Yeah. He's kind of, yeah. He floats between number one and four in the richest man in the world. And he writes this post, and it's just titled Merci, right? Thank you in French. And he basically says, so what happened was this publication in France did this year-long expose on his family. And they tried to make it as juicy as possible. So, they dropped a six-part investigative series called The Empire of Bernard Arnault. And it was talking about how it basically paints him as the last royal dynasty of France. And it describes tension between his second wife and his son-in-law and how their Sunday family dinners are palace intrigue-type of thing. And how they're trying to figure out that the five heirs, or five kids, are sort of jockeying for position. Because he's now close to 80, I think, of who's going to succeed. It's basically Succession, but for real life. And so they dropped this whole series. And he goes, here's a three-page open letter that he basically posts. And I just want to read you a little bit of this. So, he goes, thank you. That's how he starts it. Instead of being defensive, he just starts with thank you. He goes, it seems I am the head of, quote, the last royal family of France. I'm reading this between two cups of tea, and my children, who were alerted to this over WhatsApp, asked me if they should now curtsy in my presence. And I told them, hello, sir, would be sufficient. They burst out laughing. And this has just been a wonderful week. It says, it seems like Le Monde has decided to roll out the heavy artillery. Six months of investigation, two full-time journalists, blah, blah, blah. He basically paints them as absolute overkill for what they were trying to do. And this deserves a word. And that word shall be thank you. I haven't been granted this treatment since I took over the company in 1984. And at that time, they called me the Terminator. But I far preferred the last royal family. It's far more elegant and really good for sales at Dior. Then he continues on, and he basically says, he goes on and he goes, apparently, I'm the whisperer into the ear of every president. Well, I plead guilty. And he starts naming the different presidents. And he says, oh, and by the way, it's not just the French presidents. It's also five American presidents. I've whispered to three British prime ministers, blah, blah, blah. And am I to understand that only French whispers are scandalous? That a group that earns 75% of its revenue outside of Europe should be sort of isolated and not be talking to leaders of these countries? And then he basically just addresses point by point the accusations in the article, but does it in such a smooth, non-defensive French way where he basically turned a diss track into a giant compliment for himself. And he addresses each term one by one. I'll give you one more. He's known as a lover of arts and tax breaks. And he's like, yeah, I contributed 200 million euros to the reconstruction of Notre Dame. I fund, to the tune of 50 million, mathematics research at the school. I pay this much in taxes every single year. We employ 220,000 employees, 40,000 of them who work in France itself. And am I to understand that whispering into the only French whispers are scandalous? That a group that earns 75% of its revenue outside of Europe should be isolated and not be talking to leaders of these countries? And then he addresses point by point the accusations in the article. But does it in such a smooth, non-defensive French way where he turned a diss track into a giant compliment for himself. And he addresses each term one by one. I'll give you one more. He's known as a lover of arts and tax breaks. And he's like, yeah, I contributed 200 million euros to the reconstruction of Notre Dame. I fund, to the tune of 50 million, mathematics research at the school. I pay this much in taxes every single year. We employ 220,000 employees, 40,000 of them who work in France itself. Yeah, I'm sure you forgot to mention that in the research, but I'm happy to help, happy to help you here. And so he calls out the wording that they use for the different things, just making them seem a little bit ridiculous. And he ends with, rest assured, I will keep doing the Mond crossword, which that, I must say, is excellent. That's so good. Complimenting the crossword and inadvertently dissing the article. And I just thought, damn, this guy, this was such a perfect takedown where you normally see CEOs get really flustered. They either ignore, they deny, they start to complain and say they're biased and it's a hit piece and play the victim. And instead, just so smooth. And I thought there's a lot that American CEOs could learn from this. Do you know what the biggest thing is? To use humor. To bring it back to Robert Cialdini, he says the rule, likability. Likeability, how to be more likable. One of the easiest ways, I don't know if he actually said it this way, but an easy way to be more likable is to be humorous. Make them laugh. Yeah, is to make people laugh and smile. And make people laugh about the silliest stuff. And if I heard about someone doing an article, if I was in this guy's shoes and he was doing an article about my family, I would be livid, right? I wouldn't want to laugh about this. I'd be so angry. And the fact that he could do that is awesome, and it makes him 100% more likable. I didn't know anything about him other than he's a business tycoon. But now I'm like, oh, I'm kind of a fan of you. Yeah, exactly. I wasn't going to read their annual letter this year, but this. He used the intrigue of gossip, that attention, that spotlight, to say something very different, which I would say, obviously, if you just hate the guy, you're going to still hate the guy. If you love the guy, you're still going to love the guy. But the mass in the middle, which is folks like you and I who don't really care, aren't really paying attention, it's just one little nugget where you're like, hmm, I like that guy. Couldn't tell you exactly what he said, but I liked his approach. And if you've ever studied... Isn't that a French word as well? Je ne sais quoi? Yeah, he's got that je ne sais quack, you know what I mean? And people have studied this with presidential debates and whatnot. It's like after the fact, whether it's two hours later or two weeks later, you rarely can remember anything that was said. But you do remember how that person came across and the level of inadvertent trust and likability that you felt in the moment. So your impression lasts, although your memory for the specifics does not. Dude, what's crazy is I'm not aligned with Mamdani's beliefs. Mamdani, the mayor of New York, I'm not aligned with a lot of his beliefs. I'm not aligned with a lot of his ideas for policies. I see him talk on the internet, and I'm like, oh my God, you've got this dialed in. You know how to be likable. It is just insane. Have you ever watched any of his videos? Oh, yeah. And it's the same exact reaction. Oh my God. He just has it dialed in perfectly. I went to, out here in New York City, there was the national track and field meet for the professionals. And he popped in to say hi. And it got more cheers than the actual race did. And I really disagree with virtually everything he's about. But he just oozed the charisma. It was crazy. It was just absolutely crazy. He's just been on all the time. Yeah. Yeah, yeah. He kind of ran a social media master class, right? Just figuring out little memorable, likable things to do along the way. Whether it was the speech at the Knicks or talking about the halal food trucks is $14 now for a plate of chicken. What's going on? Just rather than boring people with political jargon. What's the second thing? All right. Let me tell you about this company. So, I want to tell you about a company that I had written off. I just thought it's some archaic company. And then I saw some news recently that kind of blew my mind, some numbers, and it led me down a rabbit hole. And it's the business of Magic: The Gathering. The nerdy business of Magic: The Gathering. And I wasn't interested in this at the beginning. Let me just start with that. If you said, hey, would you like to know about the business of Magic: The Gathering, I would have just moved on to the next stall. I was not paying too much attention to it. But what do you think? If you think someone would be talking to you when you guys were urinal to urinal? Yeah, yeah, exactly. Sub up. Is that what happened? You like magic? Do you want to hear about the economics? I just feel like I wouldn't have paid attention to this. And I'm telling you, it's very, very interesting. Okay, so the way I noticed this was Diego was telling me, he's like, oh, Hasbro stock popped. And he's been going to these card collectors conventions every weekend. So he's been telling me about the Pokemon scene. He's just been getting into that subculture. He doesn't really buy any stuff himself, I don't think. But he's just interested in the obsession and the fanaticism and the subculture that exists. Because it's invisible to you unless you're in one of these conventions. So he's like, yeah, Hasbro stock just popped. And it was because Magic just hit an all-time high. Magic: The Gathering. I'm like, Magic: The Gathering? Isn't this 20 years old? And it's true. Magic: The Gathering has been compounding 17% a year on average for 17 straight years. And so it's just been this incredible compounding machine. This franchise, which sounds like it might be a quick fad, like Beanie Babies. But explain what it is. So I had the cards when I was a kid, but I don't even know if it was a game or not. Yeah, so it's a game you can play. Two people can sit down and you can kind of have a duel. So it's like a card game. But, and this is kind of the genius of it, a lot of the fun isn't even playing the game against each other. Like Pokemon, it's about collecting. And so how did they do this? And so the backstory is pretty fascinating. So first of all, Hasbro is this company that owns Monopoly. They own Nerf guns. They own a bunch of stuff. But every dollar that comes in, one out of every three is driven by Magic. It is their cash cow. Magic will do $2 billion this year in revenue. It's been just cranking along. This was an all-time best quarter. So you'd think, is this old IP not fizzling out? No, no, it's having its best quarter ever. If you read the true backstory, you realize one thing, which is the power of tinkering. So this guy starts with this, he's making this game called Five Magics. And Five Magics is a game he makes, doesn't go anywhere, but he puts a lot of heart and soul and sweat into it. They own, they own a bunch of stuff. But every dollar that comes in, one out of every three is driven by Magic. It is their cash cow. Magic will do $2 billion this year in revenue. It's been just cranking along. This was an all-time best quarter. So you'd think, is this old IP not fizzling out? No, no, it's having its best quarter ever. If you read the true backstory, you realize one thing, which is what true tinkering, the power of tinkering. So this guy starts with this, he's making this game called Five Magics. And Five Magics is a game he makes, doesn't go anywhere, but he puts a lot of heart and soul and sweat into it. And he puts it on the shelf because who cares? And then he goes along and he's working a job. But then he creates this, he has this other idea for this more advanced game, Robo something, where you build robots. And it's a board game where you're actually building a robot. And then he pitches it to this guy who's doing this Wizards game. And that guy's like, dude, this is too hard to build. Can you build something that's more this sort of sci-fi lore type of game? This Wizarding lore fantasy stuff? And make it something simple. Not you have to build a robot, but just a card game or something. So he goes back and he's thinking. And he's on a hike one day. And he has a eureka moment. He's like, oh, I could take Five Magics, but I could change it. And he has this really good insight, which is most games, like chess or checkers, at the time were all fixed games. Meaning you open the box and the pieces are all what they are. Monopoly. The pieces are exactly what you think they are. And I'm going to play with you. And then when we're done, we close the lid on the box and the game stays in the box. And when Richard was growing up, he had a very unique upbringing. And this is a fascinating part of this, how this butterfly effect. So his dad moved them when he was very young to Bangladesh and Nepal. These countries that, totally fish out of water, didn't speak the language. And so to make friends, really the only thing he could do was play games. Because he didn't know how to talk. So they had to use the shared language of a game that he knew that they knew. And that game for him was marbles. And so he would go and he would play marbles. And marbles is a very unique game where you don't go and open a box and play marbles. Each kid brings their own marble set to the game. And you play and you can win other people's marbles. You could trade marbles. And you have your own ever-growing collection of marbles. And sometimes you run into a kid. He's got a marble you've never seen before. And it made you just want to go find your own version of that marble. You didn't even know it existed. And so that was part of the allure of the whole thing. And so he has this idea of, hey, what if I take that mechanic from marbles where it's this infinite set of possibilities. You have your own collection. You bring the pieces to the game. It's not a game where the pieces are already inside the box. And that was the core insight for Magic the Gathering and why 20 years later, it's printing $500 million this quarter off of that single insight about what if the players had their own collection that they would bring to the game, they would walk around with, rather than a fixed set of pieces. It's right now, it's doing $2 billion a year in revenue? It's on pace for that this year, yeah. Like $1.7 last year, $2 billion this year. And by the way, he's the great-great-grandson of James Garfield. It's kind of cool. Yeah, of the president, exactly. Yeah. So he was doing this. Did he sell it or what did he do? Yeah. So he sells it about, I don't know, six, nine years in, something like that. He sells it to Hasbro for $300-something million is the reported price, and he had to earn out that took it up to almost $500 million. So he was only five years or seven years into this when he sold it? Something like that. And he was very smart. So he was building this game. And I'll tell you how we got it off the ground. I'll tell you the very smart thing he did right before he sold it. And then why this is so great as a business model. So first, how he got it off the ground. He has the idea. He starts tinkering with it. And he's a total game design nerd. He's been focused on game mechanics and game design for a long time. In fact, when I told you he grew up in Bangladesh and Nepal and he was playing these games, he actually got into Dungeons & Dragons. But he didn't know the rules. It didn't come with the rule set. So he had the pieces, but he didn't know how to play. So he was inventing his own rule set, which, again, is, if you look through great inventions, it always comes with this weird constraint or this irritation. That sounds like a total problem. But actually, the irritation drove the innovation. So him not knowing the rules led him to experiment with all different types of game design and rule design, and he would play it. And later in life, he actually found the official rule set. It was almost bummed out. Like, oh, that's how you play? I'd been inventing all these other versions of this that were really interesting. So he had been studying game mechanics for a long time. And so even with Magic, he was playtesting like crazy. And he would do things that others weren't doing. So he would find, he would say, okay, who would be the best playtesters for this? I can take guys who play these card games or these board games. But he also went into baseball. He's like, you know who really loves studying the statistical aspects of games was Stratomatic, which was this baseball simulation game that uber statistical nerds who loved baseball would get really into Stratomatic. So he'd find the best Stratomatic players, get them to test this. Because he knew if you get the game design wrong, the game fizzles out. He's like, you could have the rich kid problem, which is just, it's all about going and buying the best cards. And once you have the best cards, you can't be beaten. So it can't have that problem. And it can't have this problem. And it can't have this problem. He was finding all the bugs before he ever got to launch. And by the time he gets to launch, he doesn't just try to launch this widely or just launch it to his friends. He goes and he drives basically down the coast. And he's going from Comic-Con to trading card conventions to board game conventions. And he's finding the white-hot center of who should love this game. And it should be basically board game nerds. And he would go and he would demo it to very small groups of people. But he would influence the influencers. He would get the guys who own the shops. He would get the guys who write the magazine articles. He would get the guys who are the pro players of other games. He would win them over. And once he won them over, they would then be his sales engine explaining it to the next people. And so he would just, traveling with the game in his trunk, go and win over, hand-to-hand combat, each of these different folks. He says he launched this in 93. So he was doing that in the 80s. Well, that was his launch strategy. And then right away, it sold out. He sold hundreds of thousands of cards in the first four days. And then he reprinted. And he had sold 10 million within the first year or something like that. It was crazy. This would be a great movie. He would get the guys who own the shops. He would get the guys who write the magazine articles. He would get the guys who are the pro players of other games. He would win them over. And once he won them over, they would then be his sales engine, explaining it to the next people. And so he would just travel with the game in his trunk, go and win over, hand-to-hand combat, each of these different folks. He says he launched this in 93. So he was doing that in the 80s. Well, that was his launch strategy. And then right away, it sold out. He sold hundreds of thousands of cards in the first four days. And then he reprinted. And he had sold 10 million within the first year or something like that. It was crazy. This would be a great movie. The early 90s, late 80s in San Diego, L.A. That is a really cool setting. And then a guy going through all this, it's not going to work. It's not going to work. Oh, it might work a little bit. It's not going to work. Okay, it really works. That type of movie would be great. And then they turn into Boone's, right? So he runs out. It sells so fast. He has no cards. He can't print any more cards. It takes time to do a print run. But the scarcity of there being no more cards and people going into shops being like, hey, do you have any magic? And the owners being like, what's magic? And then they would have to go figure out, why are people walking to our door, hunting for this thing? I've never seen this level of passion. So the scarcity drove the economy of the game. And so he, and again, the business model, the genius of the business model. So a normal board game will sell for whatever, 20 bucks, let's call it. Well, the average magic player is spending 100 bucks a year for eight or nine years of their hobby. So the average player is spending $1,000. And obviously there's extreme collectors who are spending hundreds of thousands. There's casuals who fade out right away. But if you just do the math, the LTV per customer is in the thousands of dollars per player. You could never get somebody to buy a board game for $1,000. But by doing this drip, drip, drip mechanism where you get into the game, but then you want your collection to become better so that you show up with the ace up your sleeve and you have social status because you have cool cards. And then you can trade or sell those cards. So it's an investment. It's not spending. And that's what Pokemon did afterwards. Hearthstone did that afterwards. And now a lot of the sports card stuff have really taken that model and run with it. But magic was really one of the OGs who did it. So I thought that was pretty amazing. The other cool thing he did was he bought Dungeons and Dragons. So he wanted to IPO the company. And he realized, if I'm just one piece of IP, I'm going to be seen as inherently risky. And so Dungeons and Dragons had been out before him. And it had $40 million in revenue, but it had $30 million in debt. And it was doing really poor. They stopped printing cards because they just had too much debt. They owed a bunch of money. They had scattered their business too much. So he bought the company. Nobody knows exactly how much, but it looks like it was $30, $40 million maybe. And he just took care of their debts. And in doing so, he had a more diversified brand portfolio of another franchise that had millions of players and had been around for a while. And so you buy it for $30 million. But then your eventual exit is for $300 to $500 million to Hasbro because you were more defensible. So I thought that was actually pretty brilliant as well. If you go on eBay and type in Magic the Gathering and sort by most expensive, there are cards on here that are hundreds of thousands of dollars. Yeah. That is wild. That is absolutely wild. Pokemon cards, I think the most expensive Pokemon cards sold for $10 million or something, $12 million. You know the Gooch? You remember the Gooch? Or, sorry, not the Gooch. Mooch. Oh, I sure don't. He's not the Gooch. He's the Mooch. Anthony Scaramucci. Scaramucci. The Mooch. His kid bought it from Logan Paul for $10 or $17 million or something like that. Right. What's the Gooch known for? You don't want to know. But did he raise funding? No. This is a bootstrap thing. And what year did he sell it? I think he sold it late 90s is my guess. But it was eight years in the making before he even launched the game because he's been, really, he'd been thinking about this stuff since he was a child. I think there's a belief in entrepreneurship that these ideas just sort of exist. You just have to find one and make one. Or you get to be the one who gets the winning lottery ticket. And then you read about stories like this. You read about the story of how the UFC almost went bankrupt and really Dana White and the Fertittas built that thing brick by brick against pretty much every headwind you could have. Being outlawed by states, losing money. Nobody would put them on TV. Just every headwind you could have, they faced and still built a multibillion-dollar company. Still doing it today, even after cashing out. And I think there are actually many businesses that were only going to be built by one person. It was either going to be built by that person or it wasn't going to exist. And I don't think that's a popular belief. But when you hear these stories, you just can't imagine. Would there really have been another person who had this combination of the background, the hustle, the insight, the personality, the force of will, the combination of factors that it takes to make it happen? The other time I felt this was when we were talking to Joe Gebbia from Airbnb. And he was telling the true founding story of Airbnb and all of the headaches that they faced along the way. And just being shut down and being sued and being this and being that. And it was being copied by these much bigger, more well-funded competitors. And just the number of times they escaped death in the first two years. It's like a dozen deaths that they escaped. They're out of funding. And then they create a cereal box for John McCain and Barack Obama. And they sell that at the conventions and they get just enough money to continue their business. It's like, what the hell is going on? And so those are businesses that it's like, oh, Airbnb was not meant to survive. It broke the rules. It was supposed to die 12 times. And finally, the universe gave in. It was like, fine, go ahead and exist. It was not like just anybody was going to make that happen. It was not going to happen that way. It's so good. There's a scene in the movie Rudy. Have you seen the football show or the football movie Rudy? Yeah, yeah. Yeah. Rudy's talking to a priest. And the priest is like, Rudy, I've been a priest now for this long. And there's only two things that I've realized I believe in. There is a God, and I ain't him. And whenever I hear stories of Dana White, what did we say? Or we were paraphrasing someone else. But it was like, make sure your passion burns so bright that everyone will come in town to watch you burn. Something like that. When I hear stories like this, that's what I'm envious of. I'm like, I wish I cared about anything as much as this guy cared about a stupid card game. Yeah, that's exactly right. When you hear the stories of these singular force of will, creativity. The guy who, who is it? The guy who created Minecraft? One guy? Yeah. Notch. Yeah. The whole thing himself. You know what I mean? I have a friend who's a very, very smart venture capitalist. This guy's backed some of the biggest winners. And he said something to me once about, I remember when esports was on trend. And whenever I hear stories of Dana White, what did we say? Or we were paraphrasing someone else. But it was, make sure your passion burns so bright that everyone will come in town to watch you burn. Something like that. When I hear stories like this, that's what I'm envious of. I'm like, I wish I cared about anything as much as this guy cared about a stupid card game. Yeah, that's exactly right. When you hear the stories of these singular force of will, creativity. The guy who, who is it? The guy who created Minecraft? One guy? Yeah. Notch. Yeah. The whole thing himself. I have a friend who's a very, very smart venture capitalist. This guy's backed some of the biggest winners. And he said something to me once about, I remember when esports was on trend. People were investing a lot in esports, and Overwatch franchises were selling for 20 million a pop because they were trying to make it the next NBA. And he wasn't buying any of it. And I'm like, but this is your thing. You like these weird niche things that could be huge, but they're written off. And now they're starting to pick up steam. I'm surprised you're out. He goes, esports needs its Dana White. And he was like, I don't know who that person is, but he goes, anybody could have told you that. Fighting, martial arts, it was a thing for sure. But the guy who was going to make it the worldwide thing, it took a very special batch of entrepreneurial energy to do that. And somebody who was going to just break through walls for 20 years. And so he's like, you just need to, and he's like, so I'm just waiting. I'm just waiting until esports has that. He's like, I don't think esports is not going to be a thing, but I also don't think it's going to be a thing right now because I don't see who that person is yet. And you see this with other things. Right now, longevity is obviously a huge trend. Wellness, longevity, it's replaced health and fitness as the way people want to optimize. And Brian Johnson, I think, was the Dana White of that industry. I think Brian Johnson was willing to do things no one else would do in a way, in a combination of skills and personal sacrifice that very few people were ever going to do. And he had that special combination. I think he's going to do it for a long enough time that it's going to, I mean, it's already broken mainstream, but I think it's going to just keep going. And he, in his case, he's not creating the one company necessarily that will be the winner in the way that the UFC was. But I think he made it happen in a way that no doctor, no scientist, no fitness athlete was ever going to do. Yeah, man. But I remember when we first came across him, we were like, there's this guy, he's got a blog, and he's just writing about his blood levels. But look how he does it. Look how nerdy he is. Well, what were the factors, right? He had to have, first, personal wealth to start spending millions of dollars because no investor would have funded that, right? Hey, hey, I'm going to go raise money to inject myself with crazy shit, measure every organ in my body individually for its aging speed because I want to know that my left ear lobe is aging differently than my kidney. And I'm going to do that for years. And somehow that's going to work, right? He needed personal wealth. Then how many wealthy guys would want to donate their body to science while they're still alive? Almost nobody. Yeah, well, you need someone who's basically a little bit autistic and ranks high on disagreeableness. And he, I mean, he admitted himself. He was depressed and suicidal. And so he had nothing to lose. He's like, well, being rich isn't making me happy, so let's spend the money doing something else that will give me some sense of purpose and something that will take me out of this funk. Then you needed somebody who had the unique quirky personality to be loved by some, hated by many, and watched by all. And so his look, his personality, his combination of scientific intelligence, business acumen, and willingness to look like a fool on social media, right? I actually believe that Brian Johnson is the greatest social media marketer in the world. And so if you see him now, he's like, I'm going to livestream myself taking DMT or whatever. What's that thing? A toad pissed in my mouth, and I'm going to hallucinate, whatever it is. He's doing that type of stuff on a livestream. You're like, oh my God, who would think to do this? He's got Jake Paul's social media instincts packaged in Elon Musk's wealth and Huberman's scientific, right? He's got elements of each one of those, not at each one's level, but that combination is just a very rare skill stack. Have you seen his YouTube videos? They're great. They're so good. They're not at all like anyone else's stuff. They're so good. And I'm not saying I agree with everything he's saying. I'm not saying I endorse whatever. I'm not saying any of that stuff. But all I'm saying is he undeniably broke through the noise and broke through the barriers and brought so much attention to this entire way of living that it just seems like, who else was going to do that? He told me his motivation. He was like, I can't tell you who the 70th or 50th or 100th richest person was in 1975, but I can tell you who Galileo is. I can tell you what the Wright brothers did. There's about five to 10 people who I could tell you what they invented and how they impacted society. And none of it relates around money. And so that's when I realized that going after just business and making more money was not the answer to my question of how do I be somebody that other people remember in 500 years? Because that's my motivation. Dude, when you hear stuff like that, it's such an amazing one-line kill shot because five seconds earlier, it's like, you're crazy. You'd be crazy to do that. And then he says one thing and you're like, I guess you'd be crazy not to do that. That's how effective that is. It's like, yeah, you're right. What is the money for? Nobody cares that you sold Braintree slash Venmo for $700 million. And then what are you going to do? Live the rest of your life sipping pina coladas on islands you own? Yeah, you could do that. Or you could be a man of history and you could do this. Oh, okay. You could help people live forever. I guess that isn't crazy. I guess that actually sounds way better than the alternative. Do you ever watch the Grammys where they do, or it's like the Oscars, I forget, where they do the segment where they remember the people who died that year? It's a constant of, oh, he died? Or, oh, I remember that guy. And maybe you're thinking back to a time when you did remember because that movie that person was in was your favorite movie when you were a kid. And you're like, he was the man. I love that guy. Okay. It's just like, next. And whatever, whenever that segment exists, I'm like, the vast majority, a large percentage of the people they're talking about are probably significantly more successful and impactful than I am. And yet all they're going to get from me and millions of other people is a, huh. Right. Okay. Yeah. And somehow, I'm always like, that's a bummer. And then on the other side, I'm like, that's kind of freeing, right? Just do whatever you want then. And so those segments always remind me of what Brian Johnson said. So much of the worst things of living life are caring about what other people might think of us while we're alive. If you stacked onto that and you knew everybody would care about you and think about you when you were dead, I think it would be negative. It's a good thing. We don't all have these insane legacies that everybody knows about because it's freeing to let you actually just live your life on your own terms for what you, because nobody's thinking about you anyways. I don't even know how we got onto this. Magic the Gathering? Oh, Magic the Gathering. What's the guy doing now? Yeah. On one hand, I'm always saying, that's a bummer. And then on the other hand, that's freeing, right? Just do whatever you want then. And so those segments always remind me of what Brian Johnson said. So much of the worst things of our living life are caring about what other people might think of us while we're alive. If you stacked onto that and you knew everybody would care about you and think about you when you were dead, it would, I think, be negative. Right. It's a good thing. We don't all have these insane legacies that everybody knows about because it's freeing to let you actually just live your life on your own terms because nobody's thinking about you anyway. I don't even know how we got onto this. Magic the Gathering? Oh, Magic the Gathering. What's the guy doing now? That's the true magic of Magic the Gathering. How it brings us together. All right. Is that it? That's it. That's the part. They're great. They're so good. They're not at all like anyone else's stuff. They're so good. And I'm not saying I agree with everything he's saying. I'm not saying I endorse whatever. I'm not saying any of that stuff. But all I'm saying is he undeniably broke through the noise and broke through the barriers and brought so much attention to this entire like way of living that it just seems like who else was going to do that? He told me his motivation. He was like, I can't tell you who the 70th or 50th or 100th richest person was in 1975, but I can tell you who Galileo is. I can tell you what the Wright brothers did. There's about five to 10 people who I could tell you what they invented and how they impact society. And none of them does it relate around money. And so that's when I realized that going after just business and making more money was not the answer to my question of how do I be somebody that other people remember in 500 years? Because that's my motivation. Dude, when you hear stuff like that, it's like such an amazing one-line kill shot because, you know, five seconds earlier, it's like you're crazy. You'd be crazy to do that. And then he says one thing and you're like, I guess you'd be crazy not to do that. You know what I mean? Like that's how effective that is. It's like, yeah, you're right. Like what is the money for? Nobody cares that you, you know, you sold Braintree slash Venmo for $700 million. And then, you know, what are you going to do? Live the rest of your life sipping pina coladas? Like, you know, on islands you own? Like, yeah, you could do that. Or you could be a man of history and like, you know, you could do this. Oh, okay. You could help people, you know, live forever. I guess that isn't crazy. I guess that actually sounds way better than the alternative. Do you ever watch the Grammys where they do like the, or it's like the Oscars, I forget, where they do the segment where they remember the people who died that year? It's like a constant of like, oh, he died? Or like, oh, I remember that guy. And like, you maybe are thinking back to a time when you did remember because that movie that that person in was like your favorite movie when you're a kid. And you're like, he was the man. I love that guy. Okay. Like, it's just like next. And whatever, whatever that segment exists, I'm like, the vast majority, a large percentage of the people who they're talking about are probably significantly more successful and impactful than I am. And yet all they're going to get from me and millions of other people is a, huh. Right. Okay. Yeah. And like, and some hand, I'm always like, that's a bummer. And then on the other side, I'm like, that's kind of freeing, right? Like, just do whatever you want then. And so those segments always remind me of what Brian Johnson said. So much of the worst things of our living life are caring about what other people might think of us while we're alive. If you stacked onto that and you knew everybody would care about you and think about you when you were dead, it would, I think, be negative. Right. Like, it's a good thing. We don't all have these insane legacies that everybody knows about because it's freeing to let you actually just live your life on your own terms for what you, you know, because nobody's thinking about you anyways. I don't even know how we got onto this. Magic the Gathering? Oh, Magic the Gathering. What's the guy doing now? That's the true magic of Magic the Gathering. How it brings us together. All right. Is that it? That's it. That's the part.